If placed under a larger geopolitical scope, the Russia-Ukraine conflict is not a confrontation between the West and Russia, but simply between Washington-led NATO and Moscow. However, by equating the Western anti-Russia bloc with the West as a whole, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is trying to drag the whole West into the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict.
According to a Sunday report from Russian media RIA Novosti, the NATO chief said in a recent interview with the German newspaper Handelsblatt that the normalization of relations between Western countries and Russia is impossible even after the end of the conflict in Ukraine.
It is ridiculous that Stoltenberg thinks he can speak on behalf of the West. In fact, NATO is no more than a tool of US hegemony, so what its chief says does not and cannot represent the interests of Western countries, but those of the US and its core allies that intend to maintain the hegemony of the collective West. Stoltenberg can only represent NATO and the US - or, in other words, a destructive force in the West that keeps creating conflicts.
From Stoltenberg's words, it is evident that NATO will firmly adhere to the anti-Russia strategy, which has long been the alliance's essential position. That approach indicates that the US and NATO simply don't want to see peace between Russia and Ukraine before they have completely crushed Russia.
NATO was a brainchild of the Cold War, so its days should have long been over after the iron curtain fell. But the US has been treating Russia as a rival, emphasizing that it poses a severe national security threat to the West. Russia's vast country size and powerful military capabilities have also been important considerations for NATO.
Without the function of dealing with such a so-called threat as Russia, NATO would have no use at all. Therefore, the NATO chief needs to consider how to prolong the alliance's life. NATO finds a way to justify its existence by setting up targets, including Russia. It is clear that the organization will only stop regarding Moscow as a challenge when the latter has lost all of its strengths.
In response to Stoltenberg's remarks, Leonid Slutsky, Chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, said, "He [Stoltenberg] said it very frankly: Settlement and an end to bloodshed is not the goal that the collective West is striving for. Their problem of weakening Russia is not resolved."
Slutsky pointed out the main issue sharply: Essentially, the support and assistance from the US and NATO for conflict in Ukraine are to weaken and ultimately defeat Russia. Currently, Moscow is still daunting to Washington in many ways: Russia has enormous energy and military resources. It is also a permanent member of the UN Security Council, meaning that the country still has a strong influence in international affairs. As the US is unwilling to fight Russia on its own, worrying that this might be too costly for itself, it is in Washington's interests to persuade as many European countries as possible to engage in a confrontation against Moscow.
There is slim hope of improving relations between Russia and core members of NATO, let alone of normalization. The two sides have shown significant divergence in values, security concepts, and views on the global order. In particular, the conflict in Ukraine has seriously damaged mutual political and security trust between them.
Zhang Hong, an associate research fellow at the Institute of Russian, Eastern European and Central Asian Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that in the eyes of Washington and its closest allies, the only way the two sides can regain such trust is when Russia is entirely defeated.
But it is impossible for the West as a whole to cut off relations with Russia completely. Russia is an important pole in the multi-polar world that the Western world cannot avoid or ignore. If the West and Russia continue to fall into an abnormal state of relations, such as confrontation and conflict, Europe, which is closely connected with Russia, will suffer the most.
What's more, European countries are not monolithic. As large-scale military conflicts in Ukraine ends and sporadic conflicts occur, some European countries may relax sanctions against Russia and develop their bilateral relations, because they know that continuing to contain Russia may undermine their interests, even more than Russia's. No matter how much Stoltenberg hypes up the "decoupling" with Moscow, it is impossible for many Western nations to sacrifice their own interest to become active participants in NATO's plan to defeat Russia.
All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near. Sun Tzu, The Art of War
The Empire of Chaos is relentless. Lawfare, destabilizations, sanctions, kidnappings, color revolutions, false flags, annexations: 2025 will be the year of BRICS – plus BRICS partners – as choice targets under fire.
Inestimable Prof. Michael Hudson coined “chaos” as official US policy. That’s bipartisan – and it runs across all silos of the Deep State.
In the absence of long-term strategic vision, and amidst the progressive imperial expulsion from Eurasia, all that’s left for the Hegemon is to unleash chaos from West Asia to Europe and parts of Latin America – a concerted attempt to Divide and Rule BRICS and thwart their collective drive affirming sovereignty and the primacy of national ...
While NATO may be yearning to take on Russia in the Arctic, many of its troops lack the necessary expertise for survival in such extreme conditions.
Although NATO forces regularly participate in drills in the region, many remain unprepared for the harsh realities of Arctic life.
Though NATO forces routinely participate in the bloc’s drills in the region, many of them are still not prepared to survive in the Arctic’s harsh conditions, The Sun reports citing Minna Alander, a researcher at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
"Not all NATO allies have the capabilities that are needed and that work in the Arctic environment and climate,” Alander said.....more below
